GNN - Genome News Network  
  Home | About | Topics
   
Introduction | Overview
2004 Rat
2002 Mouse
2001 30,000 Genes
2000 The Human Genome
1999 Fruit Fly
1998 Worm
1996 An Extremophile
1996 Yeast
1995 Haemophilus
1991 Venter
1986 Human Genome
1986 Hood
1983 Mullis
1978 Botstein
1977 Gilbert & Sanger
1973 Boyer & Cohen
1972 Berg
1970 Smith
1970 Temin & Baltimore
1969 Beckwith
1967 Weiss & Green
1961 Jacob & Monod
1961 Nirenberg
1960 mRNA
1957 Crick
1956 Kornberg
1953 Crick & Watson
1950 Chargaff
1944 Avery
1943 Delbruck & Luria
1941 Beadle & Tatum
1934 Bernal
1927 Muller
1913 Sturtevant
1910 Morgan
1909 Johannsen
1908 Garrod
1904 Bateson
1902 Boveri & Sutton
1900 Rediscover Mendel
1888 Boveri
1882 Flemming
1876 Galton
1869 Miescher
1866 Mendel
1859 Darwin


 Printer Friendly
Genetics and Genomics Timeline
1902
Theodor Boveri (1862-1915) and Walter Sutton (1877-1916) propose that chromosomes bear hereditary factors in accordance with Mendelian laws

Rediscovery of Mendel's laws in 1900 clarified inheritance. But Mendel had worked with traits of whole organisms. He did not investigate how characteristics are sorted and combined on a cellular level, where reproduction takes place. In 1902, the German scientist Theodor Boveri and the American Walter Sutton, working independently, suggested that chromosomes could be shown to bear the material of heredity. Mendelian concepts, as it turned out, had an excellent fit with facts about chromosomes.


Walter Sutton
Boveri had previously shown that chromosomes remain organized units through the process of cell division, and he demonstrated that sperm and egg cells each contribute the same number of chromosomes. But does each chromosome have specific properties? Is a full complement of chromosomes necessary for reproduction and development?

In a series of experimental manipulations with sea urchin eggs, Boveri demonstrated that individual chromosomes uniquely impact development. Sea urchin eggs can be fertilized with two sperm. Boveri showed that daughter cells of such double unions possess variable numbers of chromosomes. Of the embryos that result, Boveri found that only the small percentage—about 11 percent—possessing the full set of 36 chromosomes would develop normally. A "specific assortment of chromosomes is responsible for normal development," wrote Boveri in 1902, "and this can mean only that the individual chromosomes possess different qualities."

In addition, Boveri recognized the Mendelian concepts of segregation and assortment could be interpreted to operate on a cellular level, with chromosomes containing the "factors"—as Mendel called the genes. The probability was "extraordinarily high," wrote Boveri in 1903, "that the characters dealt with in Mendelian experiments are truly connected to specific chromosomes."


Theodor Boveri

An American graduate student, Walter Sutton, came to the same conclusion at about the same time. Sutton, working with marine life forms, had also become familiar with the process of "reduction division" (later called meiosis), which gives rise to reproductive germ cells, or gametes. In meiosis, the number of chromosomes is reduced by half in sperm and egg cells, with the original number restored in the zygote, or fertilized egg, during reproduction. This process was consonant with Mendel's idea of segregation. In 1902 Sutton suggested that "the association of paternal and maternal chromosomes in pairs and their subsequent separation during the reduction division...may constitute the physical basis of the Mendelian law of heredity." His "The Chromosomes in Heredity" was published in 1903.

The Boveri-Sutton Chromosome Theory, as it came to be known, was discussed and debated during the first years of the twentieth century. It was embraced by some but strongly rejected by others. By 1915 Thomas Hunt Morgan—initially a strong skeptic—laid the controversy to rest with studies of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Baltzer, F. Theodor Boveri. Science 144, 809-815 (1964).
McKusick, V.A. Walter S. Sutton and the physical basis of Mendelism. Bull Hist Med 34, 487-497 (1960).

Back to GNN Home Page